Google Workspace vs Proton Mail Business (2026)

For most teams, this decision is less about inbox features and more about operating model. Google Workspace optimizes for collaboration speed and ecosystem integration, while Proton optimizes for data confidentiality and provider-blind encryption.

If your organization handles regulated or highly sensitive client data, privacy architecture often matters more than productivity convenience. If your organization is collaboration-heavy and deeply integrated into Docs/Meet workflows, platform fit can outweigh pure privacy advantages.

For broader privacy-migration planning, pair this comparison with the De-Google Your Business Guide.

Verdict in 30 seconds:

• Choose Google Workspace if real-time collaboration (Docs, Sheets, Meet), deep integrations, and familiar UX are your top priorities
• Choose Proton if data confidentiality, zero-access encryption, Swiss jurisdiction, or GDPR/HIPAA compliance drive the decision
• Consider hybrid if you need Google's collaboration tools but have specific email or file privacy requirements
• Watch the total cost: Google Business Plus at $22/user/mo annual + Gemini add-on (~$20) reaches $42/user/mo — nearly 3× Proton's Business Suite

Quick Comparison: Google Workspace vs. Proton Business

Google Workspace wins on collaboration tools and pricing flexibility, while Proton Business leads on privacy, encryption, and data sovereignty.

Selection Framework:

• Google Workspace suits organizations prioritizing collaboration features, familiar interfaces, and extensive third-party integrations
• Proton Mail for Business serves organizations where data privacy, regulatory compliance, and end-to-end encryption are primary requirements

Who is each platform actually for? Real-world scenarios

Healthcare Practice Scenario

A 25-person medical practice handling patient records faces strict HIPAA requirements and privacy concerns.

Google Workspace Considerations:

• Requires BAA and careful configuration
• Provides collaboration features for scheduling and records management
• May integrate with existing healthcare software
• Requires additional documentation for HIPAA compliance

Proton Mail Considerations:

• End-to-end encryption protects patient communications by default
• BAA available with simpler compliance path
• 24/7 business support available for business tiers
• Strong privacy protection enhances patient trust
• May require separate solutions for some collaborative functions

Assessment: Proton's default encryption and simplified HIPAA compliance make it well-suited for healthcare environments prioritizing patient privacy.

Creative Agency Scenario

A 15-person marketing agency requires extensive collaboration on campaigns, client presentations, and creative assets.

Google Workspace Considerations:

• Real-time document collaboration essential for team workflow
• Google Slides and Docs widely used in creative industries
• Easy client sharing and collaboration
• Familiar tools reduce friction with clients and partners

Proton Mail Considerations:

• Protects client confidential information
• Secure file sharing for sensitive campaign materials
• Requires separate collaboration tools for documents
• May create workflow friction with clients using Google

Assessment: Google Workspace's collaboration features align better with creative agency workflows despite Proton's security advantages.

Law Firm Scenario

A 10-attorney law firm handles confidential client matters with strict privilege requirements.

Google Workspace Considerations:

• Collaboration features support document preparation
• May integrate with legal research tools
• Requires careful security configuration
• Client confidentiality concerns with provider data access

Proton Mail Considerations:

• End-to-end encryption protects attorney-client communications
• Zero-access architecture prevents provider access to privileged information
• Strong legal data protections under Swiss law
• Strong privacy protection enhances professional credibility

Assessment: Proton's encryption and strong legal data protections provide meaningful advantages for legal practice confidentiality requirements.

Remote Technology Company Scenario

A 30-person distributed technology startup values privacy as a company principle.

Google Workspace Considerations:

• Collaboration features support distributed team coordination
• Integration with development tools and platforms
• Familiar tools ease contractor and partner collaboration
• Privacy considerations conflict with stated company values

Proton Mail Considerations:

• Aligns with company privacy values
• Built-in VPN supports secure remote work
• Password manager addresses distributed team security
• IP protection through encrypted communications
• May require separate tools for real-time collaboration

Assessment: Either platform could serve this scenario. Proton provides stronger alignment with privacy principles, while Google offers superior collaboration features.

Understanding Google Workspace

Google Workspace integrates Gmail, Drive, Docs, Sheets, Slides, Meet, and Calendar into a unified productivity platform with custom domain support, administrative controls, and 99.9% uptime SLAs. Its architecture emphasizes real-time collaboration, with documents stored centrally and accessible across devices.

Core Strengths:

• Comprehensive collaboration tools with real-time editing
• Familiar interface reducing training requirements
• Extensive third-party application ecosystem
• Advanced AI features including smart compose and intelligent search
• Scalable storage options across pricing tiers

Considerations:

• Google explicitly states it does not train Gemini on paid Workspace data — but you are trusting their policy, not a technical guarantee
• Subject to United States jurisdiction and CLOUD Act data access laws
• Privacy policy complexity reflecting broader Google ecosystem
• Consumer Gmail is ad-supported and data-informed; paid Workspace is contractually ring-fenced but architecturally similar

Understanding Proton Mail for Business

Proton Mail for Business operates under strong privacy law protections and implements end-to-end encryption across all services. The business offering includes Proton Mail, Calendar, Drive, VPN, and Pass password manager, forming an integrated security-focused ecosystem. Proton's zero-knowledge architecture prevents the company itself from accessing user data, distinguishing it from providers that encrypt data while retaining decryption capability.

Core Strengths:

• End-to-end encryption preventing provider access to data
• Swiss privacy law protection including strong data sovereignty
• No data mining business model
• Open-source code available for independent security audits
• Integrated security suite including VPN and password management
• Proton Scribe AI writing assistant

Considerations:

• Limited third-party integration compared to Google ecosystem
• Smaller application ecosystem
• Higher entry-level pricing
• Video conferencing (Proton Meet) is currently in beta/early access — most teams still need a third-party solution

Feature Comparison

Which platform has better email features?

Google Workspace Gmail: Gmail for business provides advanced filtering, powerful search functionality, and AI-powered features. The platform handles large volumes efficiently with intelligent categorization and spam filtering. Smart Compose and Smart Reply utilize machine learning to suggest email content and responses. Storage scales with plan tier, ranging from 30GB to 5TB pooled per account.

The service maintains 99.9% uptime through Google's global infrastructure. Integration with other Google services enables seamless attachment handling through Drive and calendar event creation from email content.

Proton Mail: Proton Mail implements end-to-end encryption by default, with all messages encrypted before leaving the sender's device. The platform supports 20 email addresses per user and up to 15 custom domains per user. Password-protected emails enable secure communication with recipients using any email provider.

The Proton Scribe writing assistant provides AI-powered email composition while maintaining privacy standards. Self-destructing messages allow time-limited email access. The service supports IMAP/SMTP access through Proton Bridge, enabling use with desktop email clients while maintaining encryption.

Google provides superior search and AI features; Proton offers stronger security through architecture that prevents provider access to email content.

How do Google Calendar and Proton Calendar compare?

Google Calendar: Google Calendar integrates deeply with Gmail and Meet, enabling automatic event creation from emails and direct meeting link generation. The platform supports resource booking, multiple calendar management, and granular sharing permissions. Third-party applications can integrate through Google's calendar API.

Proton Calendar: Proton Calendar encrypts all event details including titles, descriptions, and participant information. The service supports calendar sharing with team members and integrates with Proton Mail for meeting scheduling. Availability sharing enables meeting coordination without exposing detailed calendar information.

Google offers more advanced scheduling features and broader integration. Proton provides unique encrypted calendar functionality that protects meeting details from provider access — a meaningful distinction for legal, medical, or executive teams.

Which platform offers better file storage and collaboration?

Google Drive: Google Drive forms the foundation of Google Workspace's collaboration capabilities. Real-time co-editing in Docs, Sheets, and Slides enables simultaneous multi-user document work. Version history tracks changes with restoration capability. Comment and suggestion features facilitate document review workflows.

The platform supports offline access with automatic synchronization when connectivity restores. Google's office suite provides extensive formatting options and template libraries. File format compatibility covers common business document types with conversion capability for Microsoft Office formats.

Proton Drive: Proton Drive provides encrypted storage per user (15GB on Essentials, up to 1TB on Business Suite) with end-to-end encryption protecting all uploaded files. The platform supports unlimited file sharing sizes and version history extending to 365 days. File sharing generates encrypted links with optional password protection and expiration dates.

Recent additions include an online document editor for basic document creation and editing. The platform focuses on secure file storage rather than real-time collaboration features.

Google provides comprehensive collaboration functionality essential for teams requiring simultaneous document editing. Proton prioritizes file security through end-to-end encryption — well-suited for sensitive document storage and controlled sharing, but not a replacement for Google's real-time co-editing.

Does Proton Mail have video conferencing?

Proton Meet — Proton's native video conferencing product — is currently in beta/early access, available to Visionary and Enterprise plan users. It is not yet broadly available across all Business plans, so most Proton teams still rely on third-party solutions such as Zoom, Jitsi, or Microsoft Teams for day-to-day meeting needs. The gap is closing, but it is not closed yet.

Google Meet integrates directly with Calendar and Gmail, enabling single-click meeting access. The Business Standard plan supports meetings up to 150 participants with recording capabilities. Features include screen sharing, breakout rooms, noise cancellation, and live captions. Meeting recordings save automatically to Google Drive.

For video-heavy teams, Google's fully integrated conferencing remains the more practical choice in 2026. Proton teams should budget for a separate conferencing tool when modeling total cost, and revisit Proton Meet availability as it exits beta.

Which platform has better mobile apps?

Google wins on mobile UX — and it is not particularly close. The Gmail mobile app offers gesture-based triage, snooze, smart reply, and deep integration with Calendar, Drive, and Meet. Editing a Docs file or joining a Meet call from your phone is seamless. Offline sync is reliable across the suite.

Proton's mobile apps are functional and maintain end-to-end encryption on-device, which matters for security-conscious users. However, search performance is slower (by design — encrypted search is computationally heavier), calendar integration is less fluid, and the overall experience feels more utilitarian than Google's.

For teams where mobile productivity is a daily workflow requirement, Google's apps are the stronger choice. Proton's mobile experience is adequate for users who prioritize security over convenience, but it is not a like-for-like replacement.

How does offline access compare?

This is one of the starkest practical differences between the two platforms — and one that rarely gets enough attention.

Google Workspace has world-class offline capability. Gmail, Docs, Sheets, Slides, and Drive all work without an internet connection through Chrome or the mobile apps. Changes sync automatically when connectivity restores. For road warriors, frequent flyers, or teams in areas with unreliable connectivity, this is a genuine operational advantage.

Proton has significant offline friction by design. End-to-end encryption requires key operations that depend on connectivity for full functionality. Accessing encrypted emails or Drive files offline is limited or unreliable depending on the device and app version. The Proton mobile apps cache some recent messages, but the experience is materially worse than Google's.

If your team regularly works on planes, in remote locations, or in environments with unreliable internet, this is a real consideration — not a minor footnote.

How does spam filtering and email deliverability compare?

Google sets the industry standard for spam filtering. Gmail's machine-learning-based filters have near-zero false positives for most business use cases, and outbound deliverability from Google's infrastructure is excellent. Most recipients' spam filters trust Google-originated mail by default.

Proton has solid spam filtering, but it requires more active management. Because Proton's encrypted architecture limits the signals available for automated filtering, users occasionally need to manually allow or block senders more than they would on Gmail. Outbound deliverability is generally good, but some legacy corporate spam filters are less familiar with Proton's sending infrastructure.

For high-volume outbound email or teams that cannot afford inbox management overhead, Google's filtering is the lower-friction choice.

How does customer support compare?

The support gap between the two platforms has narrowed significantly in 2026.

Google Workspace offers 24/7 support across chat, email, and phone (phone support available on Business Standard and above). Google's documentation library is extensive and well-maintained — most common issues can be resolved through self-service. Enterprise plans include dedicated support.

Proton now offers 24/7 support for business tiers — a significant upgrade from its previous business-hours-only model. Support is primarily via email and chat. Proton's documentation has improved considerably, though it remains less comprehensive than Google's for edge-case admin scenarios.

For organizations that rely heavily on self-service documentation or need phone support, Google still has an edge. For day-to-day business support needs, Proton's 2026 support offering is now competitive.

Privacy and Security Analysis

Does Google Workspace offer end-to-end encryption?

No. Google Workspace encrypts data in transit using TLS and at rest using AES-256, but Google retains the technical ability to decrypt and access your data for processing. This "managed encryption" model allows Google to offer powerful features like Smart Compose, server-side search, and spam filtering — but it means your data is technically accessible to Google engineers or law enforcement via a valid US warrant under the CLOUD Act.

The platform implements security controls including two-factor authentication, administrative security settings, and audit logging. Advanced plans include data loss prevention, security center monitoring, and endpoint management.

In contrast, Proton uses zero-access encryption. Messages encrypt on the sender's device and decrypt only on the recipient's device. Your private key is stored on your device, meaning Proton technically cannot decrypt your emails or files, even if served with a Swiss court order. Open-source code enables independent security audits, and Proton Sentinel provides advanced account protection through AI-powered threat detection combined with human security specialists.

Proton's architecture provides fundamentally stronger privacy through technical measures that prevent provider access. Google's model enables advanced features but requires trust in Google's data handling practices.

Which platform has stronger legal data protection?

Google operates as a United States company, subjecting it to U.S. law including the CLOUD Act, which enables law enforcement access to data stored globally by U.S. companies. Google publishes transparency reports detailing government data requests, which number in the thousands annually. The company's data centers span multiple countries, though data location does not determine legal jurisdiction.

Proton operates under Swiss law, which requires high legal thresholds for data access — typically a Swiss court order. Even when legally compelled, Proton cannot access encrypted data, limiting any legal data access to metadata only.

Organizations concerned about government data access or cross-border data sovereignty find a clear legal advantage with Proton.

How do the business models affect privacy?

Google's paid Workspace contract (CDPA) explicitly prohibits training AI models on customer data — this is a meaningful distinction from consumer Gmail, which is ad-supported and data-informed. However, paid Workspace still operates under Google's managed encryption model: Google retains the technical ability to decrypt your data, and the company operates under U.S. jurisdiction and the CLOUD Act. You are trusting their policy, not a technical guarantee.

Proton operates solely on subscription revenue without advertising or data monetization. Proton's zero-access encryption means they cannot access your data even if they wanted to — removing the need for trust entirely. The company's business model is structurally aligned with user privacy.

For most procurement teams, the honest framing is: Google offers policy-level privacy protections for paid accounts; Proton offers technical-level privacy guarantees. The right choice depends on your threat model and how much weight you place on contractual vs. architectural guarantees.

What is the price difference between Google and Proton in 2026?

Google Workspace plans range from $8.40 to $26.40 per user monthly (or $7.00 to $22.00 on annual commitment), following a price increase in 2025 driven by the Gemini AI push. Proton Business plans range from $6.99 to $12.99 per user annually — and have not raised prices. The gap between the two is now wider than it was in 2024, which strengthens Proton's value case for teams that do not need Google's full collaboration suite.

While entry-level pricing is similar, the value proposition differs fundamentally: Google charges for features (storage tiers, meeting participant limits), while Proton charges for privacy tiers and bundled security tools (VPN, Pass).

10-user annual cost model

Google tends to win on pure collaboration ROI. Proton tends to win when privacy, encryption posture, and jurisdiction requirements drive procurement.

Hidden cost patterns to include in procurement

Google Workspace cost multipliers:

• Gemini AI add-on: Adding Gemini AI features costs an additional ~$20/user/mo — a significant line item that is easy to overlook when comparing base plan prices.
• Security controls often improve with higher tiers or add-ons.
• Teams frequently add third-party password managers and VPN tools.
• Data residency and eDiscovery requirements may raise admin overhead.

Proton cost multipliers:

• Teams may need a separate meeting platform for large conferencing workflows.
• Advanced collaborative docs needs can require additional tooling.
• Change management is usually higher for users new to encrypted workflows.

How difficult is it to migrate to each platform?

Migrating to Google Workspace

Google provides straightforward migration from consumer Gmail accounts and other email providers. The platform's data migration service handles email, calendar, and contacts. Organizations migrating from Microsoft environments can utilize Google's migration tools designed specifically for that transition.

Implementation typically completes within days for small to medium organizations. The familiar interface reduces training requirements, with most users adapting quickly. Administrative setup includes domain verification, user account creation, and security policy configuration.

Migrating to Proton Mail

Proton's Easy Switch tool automates migration from Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, and other email providers. The tool transfers emails, calendar events, and contacts. Migration occurs in the background, allowing continued use of existing systems during transfer.

Implementation timeline typically spans 1-2 weeks, including DNS configuration for custom domains, team training, and gradual transition to ensure continuity. Proton provides migration documentation and priority support for business customers during implementation.

Organizations should plan for team communication about the transition, basic training on encrypted email features, and a phased rollout to minimize disruption.

Both platforms provide migration tools. Google's process benefits from greater interface familiarity. Proton's migration is technically straightforward — the main consideration is team adaptation to encrypted workflows, not the technical transfer itself.

Compliance and Regulatory Considerations

Which platform is better for GDPR compliance?

Google provides GDPR-compliant features and offers Data Processing Amendments required under GDPR. However, Google's U.S. base and global operations create complexity around data transfers. The company participates in frameworks addressing transatlantic data transfers, though these frameworks face ongoing legal challenges. Organizations using Google Workspace for EU operations should review Google's GDPR documentation carefully and may need additional contractual measures to address data transfer concerns.

Proton operates under Swiss law, which provides data protection standards meeting or exceeding GDPR requirements. The company's zero-access architecture inherently addresses many GDPR concerns about data processor access, since Proton cannot access user data even if compelled.

Proton's zero-access architecture provides cleaner GDPR compliance. Google requires more careful configuration and documentation to meet GDPR requirements, particularly for organizations with EU operations.

Is Proton Mail HIPAA compliant?

Yes. Proton Mail supports HIPAA compliance and offers Business Associate Agreements (BAAs) for healthcare organizations. Proton's end-to-end encryption and zero-access architecture ensure protected health information (PHI) remains encrypted and technically inaccessible to Proton — satisfying HIPAA's Security Rule requirements by default rather than through configuration.

Google Workspace also offers BAAs required for HIPAA compliance, making it technically suitable for healthcare organizations. However, proper configuration is essential, as default settings may not meet HIPAA requirements. Organizations must implement specific security controls and maintain documentation to achieve compliance.

Both platforms can support HIPAA compliance. Proton's default encryption provides technical security aligned with HIPAA requirements without extensive configuration; Google requires deliberate setup and ongoing policy management.

Industry-specific compliance

Both platforms maintain SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certifications, addressing general security and compliance frameworks. Organizations in specific regulated industries should evaluate each platform against their particular requirements.

Financial services organizations subject to regulations like GLBA may find Proton's encryption advantageous. Legal practices concerned with attorney-client privilege may prefer Proton's zero-access architecture. Organizations in less regulated industries may find Google's collaboration features more valuable than Proton's enhanced privacy.

Is Google Workspace free?

No. Google Workspace has no free tier for businesses. All plans require a paid subscription starting at $8.40/user/month (monthly) or $7.00/user/month (annual commitment) for Business Starter.

Google does offer a free "Google Workspace Essentials Starter" plan for up to 25 users, but it excludes custom email domains (Gmail only), provides limited storage, and lacks the admin controls required for most business use cases. It is not a substitute for a paid Workspace plan.

For organizations evaluating cost, the realistic entry point for business email with a custom domain is the Business Starter plan at $7.00/user/month on annual commitment.

Gemini vs. Proton Scribe: AI Feature Comparison

AI writing assistance is the #1 trending feature request for business email platforms in 2026. The two platforms take fundamentally different approaches.

Google Gemini: Gemini is Google's AI assistant integrated into Workspace. It can draft emails, summarize threads, generate documents, and analyze data in Sheets. It is powerful and deeply integrated — but it is not included in any base Workspace plan. Adding Gemini requires a separate add-on at approximately $20/user/month, nearly tripling the cost of a Business Starter subscription. Gemini processes your data on Google's servers, consistent with Google's managed encryption model.

Proton Scribe: Proton Scribe is Proton's AI writing assistant for email composition. It is included in Proton Business plans at no additional cost. Critically, Scribe is designed to run locally or with privacy-preserving processing — your email content is not sent to external AI servers for training or processing. This makes it the only AI email assistant that maintains end-to-end encryption guarantees.

Scribe is more limited in scope than Gemini (email drafting only, no spreadsheet analysis or document generation), but for organizations where data privacy is non-negotiable, it is the only viable AI option.

Decision guidance:

• If AI productivity across Docs, Sheets, and email is a priority and cost is secondary: Gemini + Google Workspace
• If AI assistance is needed without compromising encryption: Proton Scribe is the only privacy-safe option
• Budget note: A 10-person team adding Gemini to Business Standard pays ~$3,640/year in AI add-on costs alone

Can you run a hybrid setup with Google and Proton?

Yes, and many organizations do. A common hybrid configuration uses Google Workspace for Docs, Sheets, and Drive collaboration while routing sensitive email through Proton Mail. This lets teams keep Google's real-time co-editing capabilities while ensuring confidential communications — client correspondence, legal matters, executive email — are protected by Proton's zero-access encryption.

How a hybrid setup works:

• Configure your primary business domain on Proton for email (MX records point to Proton)
• Use Google Workspace under a secondary domain or subdomain (e.g., docs.yourcompany.com) for Drive and collaboration
• Staff use Proton Mail for external and sensitive communications, Google Meet/Docs for internal collaboration
• Proton Drive handles sensitive file storage; Google Drive handles collaborative working documents

When hybrid makes sense:

• Teams that cannot give up Google Docs real-time collaboration but have compliance requirements for email
• Organizations migrating gradually from Google to Proton (hybrid as a transition state)
• Legal, finance, or HR departments within a larger Google-first organization that need stronger email privacy

Operational considerations:

• Two separate admin consoles to manage increases IT overhead
• Licensing costs for both platforms apply; model total cost carefully before committing

What is the admin burden difference between Google and Proton?

This is one of the most underestimated friction points when evaluating Proton for organizations accustomed to Google.

Google Workspace admin experience: Google's Admin Console is mature and well-documented. Password resets are self-service or admin-triggered in seconds. User provisioning, group management, and security policy enforcement are centralized. Most IT generalists can manage a Google Workspace environment without specialized training.

Proton admin experience: Proton's encryption model introduces additional IT management requirements that Google does not have:

• Key management: Each user has encryption keys. Admins cannot reset a user's private key without data loss — recovery requires the user's recovery phrase or a pre-configured recovery method.
• Recovery phrase management: Organizations must establish and enforce recovery phrase policies before users lose access to their accounts.
• Offboarding complexity: Revoking access to an encrypted mailbox requires more deliberate planning than a standard Google account deactivation.
• Proton Bridge management: Teams using desktop email clients must manage Proton Bridge installations, which adds a software dependency.

For organizations with a dedicated IT team, these requirements are manageable. For small businesses without IT staff, the operational overhead is a real cost that should factor into the platform decision.

Mitigation: Proton's admin documentation has improved significantly, and the Proton for Business dashboard provides centralized user management. The gap has narrowed, but Google remains meaningfully simpler to administer at scale.

Selection Framework

Choose Google Workspace When:

Organizations should consider Google Workspace when collaboration requirements dominate other considerations. The platform suits teams requiring real-time document co-editing, extensive third-party integrations, and familiar interfaces. Google's extensive feature set and ecosystem provide comprehensive productivity tools.

Businesses comfortable with Google's privacy model and U.S. jurisdiction will find Google Workspace provides excellent value. Organizations primarily serving U.S. markets without stringent privacy requirements can benefit from Google's advanced AI features and broad integration ecosystem.

Choose Proton Mail When:

Organizations should consider Proton Mail when privacy and security requirements are primary. The platform suits businesses handling sensitive information, operating in regulated industries, or serving privacy-conscious markets. Proton's end-to-end encryption and strong legal data protections provide meaningful advantages for data-sensitive workflows.

Businesses requiring demonstrable privacy protections, operating under strict regulatory requirements like GDPR or HIPAA, or building privacy into their brand identity will find Proton's architecture aligned with these requirements. The included VPN and password manager provide additional value for security-conscious organizations.

FAQ

Conclusion

Google Workspace and Proton Mail for Business serve different organizational priorities. Google excels in collaboration, integration, and feature breadth. Proton provides stronger privacy through technical architecture that prevents provider data access and strong legal data protections.

Organizations should evaluate their core requirements. Teams prioritizing collaboration, familiar interfaces, and extensive integrations will find Google Workspace well-suited to their needs. Organizations handling sensitive data, operating under strict privacy regulations, or building privacy into their brand will find Proton's architecture provides meaningful advantages.

For businesses in healthcare, legal, financial services, or other regulated industries, Proton's end-to-end encryption and simplified compliance path deserve consideration. For creative, marketing, or collaboration-intensive organizations, Google's real-time editing and integration ecosystem may prove more valuable.

The appropriate choice depends on honest assessment of organizational priorities and requirements. Both platforms provide professional business email; the selection should align with your organization's values, regulatory requirements, and operational needs.

Ready to evaluate which platform suits your organization? Take our business email security assessment to receive personalized recommendations based on your specific requirements and industry.

Related Articles

More from Email Security and Privacy Platform Decisions

View all comparisons

Product Review

Feb 2026

Proton Business Suite Review (2026)

Independent review of Proton's business stack with security architecture, pricing context, and implementation fit.

15 min read

Implementation Guide

Feb 2026

Google Workspace to Proton Migration Guide

Migration playbook for planning phased email and collaboration transitions with minimal disruption.

16 min read

Implementation Guide

Feb 2026

Business Email Security Guide (2026)

Operational email security baseline covering authentication controls, phishing defense, and incident response.

14 min read

Primary references (verified 2026-02-18):

• Google Workspace pricing and plans
• Proton for Business
• NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

Affiliate note: Some links in this guide may be partner links. Recommendations are based on fit and product quality.